174
recorded votes
1
bills sponsored
2
cosponsored
0%
votes missed
2026
first took office
The numbers
based on decisive floor votesAgrees with you
sign in to see
Kept their word
1 kept · 0 broken
Sides with constituents
not enough local votes yet
Votes with party
174 roll calls
“Agrees with you” compares your recorded position on a bill against this member's vote on the bill's decisive roll call — passage or an equivalent up-or-down vote, not procedural motions. Abstentions are excluded rather than counted as disagreement.
Who funds them
FEC filings, 2026 cycle$258k
from PACs
86
contributions
$19k
routed through organizations
$27k
moved between their own committees
$2.9M
spent supporting them
$27k
spent against them
- American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action CommitteeAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- American Revival PACAMERICAN REVIVAL PAC$10k
- Ball CorporationBALL CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Buckeye Liberty Political Action CommitteeBUCKEYE LIBERTY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Commander ZinkeSEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC$10k
- Credit Union National Association, Inc.AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC.$10k
- Emmer Victory CommitteeELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS PAC$10k
- In the Arena PACIN THE ARENA PAC$10k
- Koch, Inc.KOCH, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (KOCHPAC)$10k
- Leidos, Inc.LEIDOS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Mr. Southern Missourian in the House PACMR. SOUTHERN MISSOURIAN IN THE HOUSE PAC$10k
- National Association of RealtorsNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
Individual money routed through organizations
not the organization's own moneyThis is individuals' money, not the organization's. Supporters write checks earmarked for a named candidate, the organization collects them and passes them on — so it isn't bound by the PAC limits above, and it doesn't come out of the organization's own funds. It is still worth knowing: somebody chose this candidate and did the gathering.
- Rep. Jack BergmanTHE GUARDIAN FUND$10k
- Club for GrowthCLUB FOR GROWTH PAC$8,795
A PAC can give a candidate up to $10,000 per election cycle — $5,000 for the primary and $5,000 for the general — so totals spanning two cycles run to about $20,000 at the top end. Occasional larger figures usually mean a special election or a runoff, which counts as another election.
Money moved between committees the candidate controls — a House campaign fund transferred to a Senate run, for instance. It isn't a donation from anyone and isn't counted as one.
The PAC figures above are the organizations' own contributions only. Earmarked money they merely carried is listed separately, and independent expenditures separately again — they aren't gifts to the campaign, and money spent against a member would otherwise appear as backing. Source: FEC bulk filings ↗
Individuals vs PACs
FEC filings, 2026 cycle58%
from outside Georgia
18%
in gifts under $200
88
maximum contributions
$887k
itemised, from 756 gifts
That's state, not district. ZIP codes straddle congressional districts, so placing a donation inside one would be a guess — and this site doesn't guess. For a House member, treat the out-of-state figure as a floor: some of the in-state money came from outside the district too.
Where their donors work
- Rndc2 donors$7,000
- Rosewood Corporation2 donors$7,000
- Old Court Group7 donors$7,000
- Epm2 donors$7,000
- Federal Government2 donors$6,871
- Evans Grading Company2 donors$4,500
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP3 donors$4,000
- Cobb V Realty3 donors$3,644
- Popewalters3 donors$3,644
- Semg3 donors$3,644
Grouped from what donors wrote in the employer box on their own filing. It's free text, so “retired”, “self” and “homemaker” are dropped rather than dressed up as employers — and one employer can appear twice under two spellings, because merging them would mean guessing which spellings mean the same thing. A company listed here has given nothing itself; its employees have, as individuals.
Maximum donors
People who gave at least one full election maximum — 88 such contributions in total. The largest 25 are listed.
- CHAPIN, WILLIAM MR.TN$19k
- PEEPLES, TOM MR.GA$12k
- ACKOUREY, MARY ANNE MS.GA$11k
- PARKER, DAVIDGA$8,600
- MATHIS, BENTON J. MR.GA$7,000
- HOWALT, CYNTHIA B. MR.GA$7,000
- HOWALT, FREDERICK H. MR.GA$7,000
- PEROT, ROSS MR. JR.TX$7,000
- PEREZ, EDUARDOGA$7,000
- DANIEL, DAVID P. MR.GA$7,000
- SANDS, PATRICKTX$7,000
- MITTELMAN, HARRYCA$5,000
- POPE, BILLTX$3,644
- ANTALIS, JOHN S. MR.GA$3,644
- BROWNE, JOHNGA$3,644
- LEWIS, DIANEFL$3,644
- RESPESS, BRADTN$3,644
- BLACK, DAVIDTN$3,644
- LEDWELL, STEVE MR.TX$3,500
- WELDON, PETER MR.FL$3,500
- BRUMBERG, MACKENZIECT$3,500
- DOYLE, AMY MRS.GA$3,500
- PARKER, DAVID MR.GA$3,500
- EVANS, KEVINGA$3,500
- WAYNE, ROBINSON,GA$3,500
Name and state only — no address, no employer, and no way to search for a person on this site. These are public FEC filings, but someone who gave $3,500 is a private citizen, not a public official, and the point of listing them is to show who funds a politician rather than to build a directory of donors.
Individual giving is aggregated by the FEC and read from its API — including the $197k given in amounts under $200, which never appears in the bulk download because donors under that threshold aren't named. Source: FEC ↗
When a donor said what it wanted
2 billsVoted with donors
2 of 2
Across 2 bills where an organization that gave Fuller money publicly stated what it wanted, and Fuller cast a recorded vote. Those organizations gave $11k in total.
- H.R. 7128 TRIA Program Reauthorization Act of 2026voted with the donor
National Association of Realtors gave $10k and wanted it passed. The member voted Yea.
“…Communications with the House of Representatives supporting H.R. 7128 TRIA Program Reauthorization Act to extend the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program. Communications with the House of Representatives regarding…” filing ↗
- H.R. 8800 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027voted with the donor
Lockheed Martin Corporation gave $1,000 and wanted it passed. The member voted Yea.
“General issues related to defense spending and support for the F-35, C-130, and U-2 programs in H.R. 8800/S. 4784, the Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and H.R. 9495, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act,…” filing ↗
Read this carefully: it counts only bills where the organization itself stated a position, in its own lobbying filing or a public statement, and where the member cast a recorded vote. VoteWire never guesses what a donor wanted. And alignment is not influence — PACs overwhelmingly give to members who already vote their way, so a high number more often reflects who chose whom than who bought whom. The full method.
Did they keep their word?
stated position vs. recorded vote- H.R. 8787 Servicemember Payment Data Privacy and Security ActNo vote yet
cosponsored this bill on May 22, 2026 · official congressional record ↗
- H.Res. 1182 Expressing support for rural communities across the United States as stewards of the environment, major suppliers of United States energy resources, critical providers of food production and manufacturing capacity, and drivers of national economic stability, and recognizing the work of the House of Representatives in the 119th Congress in support of those vital communities.Followed through
wrote this bill on Apr 16, 2026 · voted Yea Apr 22, 2026 · official congressional record ↗
- H.R. 7296 SAVE America ActNo vote yet
cosponsored this bill on Apr 15, 2026 · official congressional record ↗
Fair warning on reading this section: a bill can change a great deal between the day a member adds their name to it and the day it reaches the floor. Voting against a bill you cosponsored is sometimes a reversal and sometimes a reasonable response to an amendment — which is why every row links to the official record instead of just handing you a verdict.
Recent votes on bills
sign in to compareBills they sponsored
- H.Res. 1182 Expressing support for rural communities across the United States as stewards of the environment, major suppliers of United States energy resources, critical providers of food production and manufacturing capacity, and drivers of national economic stability, and recognizing the work of the House of Representatives in the 119th Congress in support of those vital communities.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.