H.R. 4219House bill · 119th CongressIn the SenatePublic Lands and Natural Resources

National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act of 2025

Sponsored byEd CaseD-HI-1Introduced Jun 27, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 15, 2026) — Received in the Senate and Read twice and on Environment and Public Works.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Aug 27, 2026

This bill provides statutory authority for the Invasive Species Strike Team program carried out by the National Wildlife Refuge System within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). This program operates teams in each FWS region that coordinate with public and private entities to address invasive species and related conservation issues in and around the National Wildlife Refuge System.

The bill requires FWS to report to Congress on the program's work and progress towards addressing invasive species that pose a major concern to the environment, human health, or the economy.

Face Value

as reported to the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

1 recorded
  • On , as Amendeddecisive vote

    House · Sep 14, 2026

    A fast-track vote: no amendments, short debate, and two thirds needed to pass. Used for bills expected to be uncontroversial.

    371 – 33

    Passed

    Every vote →

Discussion

4 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
6
river_readerDemoIL-10voted Nay23d ago
Support, without enthusiasm. A narrow fix now beats a comprehensive one that never arrives. I'd want the cost estimate before I'd defend either position.
5
b_haverfordDemoLA-6voted Yea23d ago
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes. None of that is settled by the summary.
4
TheLongViewDemoNY-6voted Nay23d ago
Honest question, not a trap: what would change your mind?
1
TheLongViewDemoNY-6voted Nay23d ago
The reporting requirements are the useful part. You can't argue about something nobody is required to measure. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
Your position on H.R. 4219No positions yet