H.R. 5334House bill · 119th CongressSigned into lawtext replacedInternational Affairs(orig.)

Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026

Sponsored byJimmy PanettaD-CA-19Introduced Sep 11, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 18, 2026) — No: 119-111.

This bill is not what it was

It passed the House as SEED Act. The Senate then struck its text and put different legislation in its place on Aug 7, 2026. The text that came back is Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026. The bill number did not change, so the committee report, the sponsor and the record of who backed it all still refer to the original.

Replacing a bill's text this way is legal and common enough to have a name — a legislative vehicle. We flag it because nothing in the official record does.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Aug 7, 2026

This bill imposes a variety of sanctions, tariffs, and prohibitions related to Russia, extends an Iran-related sanctions law, and expands a tax deduction for teacher expenses to include early childhood educators.

For example, under the bill, the President must impose visa- and property-blocking sanctions on specified persons (individuals and entities) such as the Russian president and certain Russian military commanders. The President must also increase the rate of duty up to 100% ad valorem (i.e., relative to the value) on all goods imported into the United States from a country that was among the five largest importers of Russian-origin crude oil or natural gas if such country knowingly makes new purchases of such products after enactment of the bill.

The bill prohibits (1) the export, reexport, or in-country transfer to or in Russia of any U.S.-produced energy or energy product; (2) U.S. persons from making new investments in Russia or purchasing Russian sovereign debt; and (3) trading the securities of Russian government-owned, -controlled, or -affiliated entities on U.S. national securities exchanges.

The bill extends through 2031 the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, which requires the President, with some exceptions, to impose sanctions on certain persons engaged in specified transactions related to Iran's energy sector or Iran's efforts to acquire or develop certain weapons.

The bill expands eligibility for federal tax deductions of certain educator expenses to early childhood educators providing educational or childcare services to those under age 6.

Face Value

as passed the Senate
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

4 recorded
  • of the Billdecisive vote

    Senate · Aug 7, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the Senate. This is the vote most people mean.

    86 – 11

    Bill Passed

    Every vote →
  • On in the Senate Amendmentsdecisive vote

    House · Sep 16, 2026

    Whether the House accepts the changes the other chamber made. This is often the vote that finally settles a bill.

    262 – 159

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • On on the

    Senate · Jul 28, 2026

    Whether to end debate on whether to start debating it. Needs 60 senators; failing here kills the bill without a vote on the bill.

    86 – 12

    Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    Every vote →
  • On the

    Senate · Jul 29, 2026

    Whether to start debating it at all. Not a vote on the bill itself.

    84 – 12

    Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    Every vote →

Discussion

14 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
8
clay_commuterDemoCA-7voted Yea16d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
5
sam_whitfieldDemoMD-7voted Yea15d ago
Fair, though the alternative on the table is nothing, and nothing has a cost too.
8
imogen.ferreiraDemoMA-7voted Yea16d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. The committee report would settle it either way.
7
harbor_districtDemoOH-4voted Yea15d ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
7
sam_whitfieldDemoMD-7voted Yea15d ago
I'd support this and still say the effective date is optimistic. Everything downstream of it assumes agencies move faster than they do. I'd rather see it fixed in committee than argued about on the floor.
7
front_range_dadDemoNC-13voted Yea17d ago
Genuine question rather than a gotcha: what does success look like in five years? If we can't say, what are we actually voting on? Whether that matters depends entirely on the implementation date.
5
tomas.delgadoDemoVA-4voted Nay2mo ago
Opposed, mainly on process — this hasn't had a hearing that I can find, and it's moving fast for something with this much reach.
0
grantwoodDemoVA-4voted Yea2mo ago
This is my worry too — the cost estimate always assumes full compliance and full compliance never happens.
2
rustbelt_rayDemoLA-2voted Yea2mo ago
Fair, but the alternative on the table is nothing, and nothing has a cost too.
2
lauren_vDemoOK-2voted Nay2mo ago
You're right about the drafting, but that's fixable in conference. Killing it now means starting over in the next Congress.
4
adaeze_oDemoTX-6voted Nay17d ago
Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. I'd rather see it fixed in committee than argued about on the floor.
2
deltalibrarianDemoDC-ALvoted Yea16d ago
Genuine question rather than a gotcha: what does success look like in five years? If we can't say, what are we actually voting on? I'd rather see it fixed in committee than argued about on the floor.
1
magnusgrimmettCO-3voted Yea1mo ago
this should now be followed or pinned
0
magnusgrimmettCO-3voted Yea1mo ago
This is a test comment
Your position on H.R. 5334100% Yea · 3 VoteWire users