H.J.Res. 1House joint resolution · 119th CongressIn progressLaw

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

Sponsored byAndy BiggsR-AZ-5Introduced Jan 3, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 2, 2026) — On the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 212 - 206 (Roll no. 293).

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jan 3, 2025

This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring the Supreme Court to be composed of nine Justices—one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices.

Face Value

as reported to the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

1 recorded
  • On decisive vote

    House · Sep 2, 2026

    A fast-track vote: no amendments, short debate, and two thirds needed to pass. Used for bills expected to be uncontroversial.

    212 – 206

    Failed

    Every vote →

Discussion

3 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
2
delta_dawn_laDemoHI-2voted Yea1mo ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
1
wxriveraDemoMN-4voted Nay1mo ago
The drafting is loose in places where loose drafting is expensive. Conference could fix it; conference could also make it worse. Happy to be told I've read it wrong.
4
arthur.oduyaDemoTX-41mo ago
"The states are doing it" cuts the other way for me. If it works there, why federalise it?
Your position on H.J.Res. 1No positions yet