631
recorded votes
1
bills sponsored
7
cosponsored
4%
votes missed
2011
first took office · Senate since 2013
The numbers
based on decisive floor votesAgrees with you
sign in to see
Kept their word
2 kept · 0 broken
Sides with constituents
6 bills with a local majority
Votes with party
603 roll calls
“Agrees with you” compares your recorded position on a bill against this member's vote on the bill's decisive roll call — passage or an equivalent up-or-down vote, not procedural motions. Abstentions are excluded rather than counted as disagreement.
Who funds them
FEC filings, 2024 + 2026 cycles$-5,372
from PACs
7,971
contributions
$30k
routed through organizations
$4,000
moved between their own committees
$100k
spent supporting them
- Asian American Hotel Owners AssociationASIAN AMERICAN HOTEL OWNERS ASSOCIATION PAC (AAHOA PAC)$10k
- Barclays Group US, Inc.BARCLAYS GROUP US INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Ernst & Young Political Action CommitteeERNST & YOUNG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Invesco Holding Company USs), Inc.INVESCO HOLDING COMPANY (US), INC. EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Investment Company InstituteINVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ICI PAC)$10k
- Lsta, Inc.LSTA, INC. PAC$10k
- Ryan LLC Political Action Committee (ryanpac)RYAN LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RYANPAC)$10k
- Securities Industry and Financial Markets AssociationSECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10k
- Small Business Investor AllianceSMALL BUSINESS INVESTOR ALLIANCE PAC$10k
- Structured Finance Coalition Political Action Committee (structured Finance PAC)STRUCTURED FINANCE COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (STRUCTURED FINANCE PAC)$10k
- United Health Services, Inc.UNITED HEALTH SERVICES PAC, INC.$10k
- Samsung Electronics America Inc Political Action CommitteeSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$8,000
Individual money routed through organizations
not the organization's own moneyThis is individuals' money, not the organization's. Supporters write checks earmarked for a named candidate, the organization collects them and passes them on — so it isn't bound by the PAC limits above, and it doesn't come out of the organization's own funds. It is still worth knowing: somebody chose this candidate and did the gathering.
- Direct Supply, Inc. Partners PAC (DSI Partners PAC)DIRECT SUPPLY, INC. PARTNERS PAC (DSI PARTNERS PAC)$15k
- The Capital Group Companies, Inc.THE CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15k
A PAC can give a candidate up to $10,000 per election cycle — $5,000 for the primary and $5,000 for the general — so totals spanning two cycles run to about $20,000 at the top end. Occasional larger figures usually mean a special election or a runoff, which counts as another election.
Money moved between committees the candidate controls — a House campaign fund transferred to a Senate run, for instance. It isn't a donation from anyone and isn't counted as one.
The PAC figures above are the organizations' own contributions only. Earmarked money they merely carried is listed separately, and independent expenditures separately again — they aren't gifts to the campaign, and money spent against a member would otherwise appear as backing. Source: FEC bulk filings ↗
Individuals vs PACs
FEC filings, 2022 cycle84%
from outside South Carolina
64%
in gifts under $200
2,089
maximum contributions
$17.9M
itemised, from 22,177 gifts
Where their donors work
- Home62 donors$76k
- Goldman Sachs21 donors$51k
- Metlife25 donors$41k
- Blackstone18 donors$41k
- Archer Auto Group170 donors$34k
- Capital Group11 donors$33k
- Visa28 donors$33k
- Apollo Global Management12 donors$27k
- Kasowitz Benson Torres7 donors$23k
- Stadium Capital Management LLC4 donors$23k
Grouped from what donors wrote in the employer box on their own filing. It's free text, so “retired”, “self” and “homemaker” are dropped rather than dressed up as employers — and one employer can appear twice under two spellings, because merging them would mean guessing which spellings mean the same thing. A company listed here has given nothing itself; its employees have, as individuals.
Maximum donors
People who gave at least one full election maximum — 2,089 such contributions in total. The largest 25 are listed.
- SEAVER, ALEXANDERFL$23k
- BYERS, RICHARDIN$22k
- KASOWITZ, MARCNY$17k
- REYNOLDS, ROBERTMA$17k
- RIKLIS, IRANY$17k
- DANIS, THOMASFL$17k
- RAETHER, PAULNY$17k
- HOLSCHER, KELLY ANNCA$15k
- NEWMAN, RICHARDCA$15k
- ROGERS, TIMCA$15k
- RAMSEY, JASONNC$15k
- TOSETTI, PAULCA$15k
- LEWIS, EDWARDCA$15k
- GROFF, SUECA$15k
- ETHERIDGE, GEORGEFL$15k
- TANKEL, ZANENY$15k
- SUGARMAN, BURTCA$15k
- STEIN, SHELDONTX$15k
- BARKLEY, ROBERTTX$13k
- HERTZ, DIANEIL$12k
- PETTISE, STEPHENUT$12k
- ARMSTRONG, HARVEYCA$12k
- CREYDT, WARRENMO$12k
- OGENS, EMMAFL$12k
- WATKINS, PATAL$12k
Name and state only — no address, no employer, and no way to search for a person on this site. These are public FEC filings, but someone who gave $3,500 is a private citizen, not a public official, and the point of listing them is to show who funds a politician rather than to build a directory of donors.
Individual giving is aggregated by the FEC and read from its API — including the $31.4M given in amounts under $200, which never appears in the bulk download because donors under that threshold aren't named. Source: FEC ↗
When a donor said what it wanted
4 billsVoted with donors
4 of 4
Across 4 bills where an organization that gave Scott money publicly stated what it wanted, and Scott cast a recorded vote. Those organizations gave $5,500 in total.
- S. 4784 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027voted with the donor
Lockheed Martin Corporation gave $5,000 and wanted it passed. The member voted Yea.
“General issues related to defense spending and support for the F-35, C-130, and U-2 programs in H.R. 8800/S. 4784, the Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and H.R. 9495, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2027” filing ↗
Toyota Motor North America, Inc gave $1,500 and wanted it passed. The member voted Yea.
“…To support the creation one national standard. H.J. Res 88 S.J. Res 45 To advance permitting reform and access to critical minerals for EV battery production: Energy Permitting Reform Act (EPRA)…” filing ↗
- H.R. 1 An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.voted with the donor
Society for Vascular Surgery gave $1,500 and wanted it passed. The member voted Yea.
“…Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 Support for continued funding for medical research Support for continued funding for health-related agencies H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill” filing ↗
- H.R. 1 An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.voted with the donor
Alabama Farmers Federation * gave $-2,500 and wanted it passed. The member voted Yea.
“Supported H.R. 1, specifically the tax and farm bill-related provisions Supported Section 453 of the House version of the FY26 Interior, Environment, and…” filing ↗
Read this carefully: it counts only bills where the organization itself stated a position, in its own lobbying filing or a public statement, and where the member cast a recorded vote. VoteWire never guesses what a donor wanted. And alignment is not influence — PACs overwhelmingly give to members who already vote their way, so a high number more often reflects who chose whom than who bought whom. The full method.
Did they keep their word?
stated position vs. recorded vote- S. 5116 MERIT ActNo vote yet
cosponsored this bill on Jul 23, 2026 · official congressional record ↗
- S. 3627 Pregnant Students’ Rights ActFollowed through
cosponsored this bill on Jan 27, 2026 · voted Yea Jan 27, 2026 · official congressional record ↗
- S. 1779 LOCOMOTIVES ActNo vote yet
cosponsored this bill on May 15, 2025 · official congressional record ↗
- S. 1582 GENIUS ActFollowed through
cosponsored this bill on May 1, 2025 · voted Yea Jun 17, 2025 · official congressional record ↗
- S.J.Res. 28 A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications".No vote yet
cosponsored this bill on Mar 4, 2025 · official congressional record ↗
- S.J.Res. 18 A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions".No vote yet
wrote this bill on Feb 13, 2025 · official congressional record ↗
- S.J.Res. 13 A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the Department of the Treasury relating to the review of applications under the Bank Merger Act.No vote yet
cosponsored this bill on Feb 6, 2025 · official congressional record ↗
- S. 5 Laken Riley ActNo vote yet
cosponsored this bill on Jan 8, 2025 · official congressional record ↗
Fair warning on reading this section: a bill can change a great deal between the day a member adds their name to it and the day it reaches the floor. Voting against a bill you cosponsored is sometimes a reversal and sometimes a reasonable response to an amendment — which is why every row links to the official record instead of just handing you a verdict.
