H.R. 7008House bill · 119th CongressIn progressCongress

Stop Insider Trading Act

Sponsored byBryan SteilR-WI-1Introduced Jan 12, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 30, 2026) — on the to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 47. Record Vote Number: 253.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Feb 3, 2026

This bill generally prohibits Members of Congress and their spouses and dependent children from purchasing stocks and requires public notice before these individuals may sell stocks.

Specifically, Members of Congress and the spouses and dependent children of Members of Congress may not purchase covered investments. Between 7 and 14 days before a Member or a covered spouse or dependent sells a covered investment, the relevant Member must file public notice of the intent to sell with the Clerk of the House of Representatives or the Secretary of the Senate, as appropriate. The Clerk or Secretary must publish this notice online. If the individual decides not to sell the covered investment, the notice must be withdrawn.

Under the bill, a covered investment is a security issued by a publicly traded company or a comparable economic interest. Some investments are exempt, including interest in a widely held investment fund and certain investments held in a trust.

Violations of these provisions are subject to a fee and, in the case of a purchase, a requirement to sell the covered investment. The fee must equal (1) the greater of $2,000 or 10% of the transaction value, and (2) any net gain realized from the transaction during a specified period. The fee may not be paid using campaign donations or Members’ official allowances.

Certain transactions by covered spouses and dependents are exempt, including transactions made on behalf of another person or made as part of compensation from the individual’s employer.

Face Value

as passed the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

3 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Jul 22, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    232 – 198

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • On on the decisive vote

    Senate · Sep 30, 2026

    Whether to end debate on whether to start debating it. Needs 60 senators; failing here kills the bill without a vote on the bill.

    53 – 47

    Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected

    Every vote →
  • On

    House · Jul 22, 2026

    The minority party's last attempt to change the bill by sending it back to committee. It usually fails and is usually about forcing an awkward vote.

    211 – 218

    Failed

    Every vote →

Discussion

9 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
14
steelcityscribeDemoMI-7voted Yea2mo ago
This is the kind of unglamorous plumbing that never makes the news and matters more than the stuff that does.
11
aviva_sternDemoMO-2voted Yea2mo ago
Support. The reporting requirements alone would be worth it. You can't fix what nobody is required to measure.
10
grantwoodDemoVA-4voted Nay2mo ago
This is my worry too — the cost estimate always assumes full compliance and full compliance never happens.
9
cecilia_ruizDemoMI-3voted Nay2mo ago
I'd add that the states already doing this haven't seen the effects the opponents predicted. That's some evidence.
5
steelcityscribeDemoMI-7voted Yea2mo ago
Same conclusion, different reasoning. I'm less worried about scope and more about who administers it.
-1
lauren_vDemoOK-2voted Yea2mo ago
Honest question, not a gotcha: what would change your mind on this?
1
grantwoodDemoVA-4voted Nay2mo ago
The intent is fine. The drafting is not. There's no sunset, no review, and no mechanism to stop it if it turns out to be counterproductive.
5
lauren_vDemoOK-2voted Yea2mo ago
Counterpoint: the reporting requirement is the guardrail. Once the numbers are public the politics change on their own.
1
cecilia_ruizDemoMI-3voted Nay2mo ago
The sunset clause point is the strongest argument in this thread and nobody has answered it.
Your position on H.R. 700864% Yea · 11 VoteWire users