H.R. 8481House bill · 119th CongressIn progressCrime and Law Enforcement

Kayleigh’s Law Act of 2026

Sponsored byAbraham J. HamadehR-AZ-8Introduced Apr 23, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Aug 31, 2026) — Motion to reconsider Agreed to without objection.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jul 6, 2026

This bill establishes a federal statutory framework to require federal courts to issue an order prohibiting contact with a victim (i.e., a no-contact order) in the case of a defendant who is convicted of certain violent crimes or sex crimes.

Specifically, in the case of a defendant convicted of a felony offense that is a crime of violence or that involves a sexual act or sexual conduct, on a motion by the victim or federal government, the court must issue a no-contact order.

Under the framework, the no-contact order must be imposed at sentencing and be in effect for the lifetime of the defendant unless it is terminated or suspended in accordance with specified procedures. Additionally, no fee may be assessed or collected from a victim in connection with the issuance of a no-contact order.

Face Value

as reported to the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

5 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
6
elena.papadakisDemoGA-5voted Yea1mo ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
1
cascade_kaiDemoIN-6voted Nay1mo ago
Where are you reading that? I've been through the summary twice and can't find it.
5
cascade_kaiDemoIN-6voted Nay1mo ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
4
OldLineStateDemoOH-1voted Nay1mo ago
The cost estimate assumes full compliance, and full compliance never happens. That gap is where these things go wrong. Someone closer to this than me should say whether that's right.
2
kwame.abadiDemoFL-13voted Yea1mo ago
The cost estimate assumes full compliance, and full compliance never happens. That gap is where these things go wrong. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
Your position on H.R. 8481No positions yet