H.R. 2713House bill · 119th CongressIn progressCommerce

MAIN Event Ticketing Act

Sponsored byDiana HarshbargerR-TN-1Introduced Apr 8, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 1, 2026) Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by .

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Apr 8, 2025

Mitigating Automated Internet Networks for Event Ticketing Act or the MAIN Event Ticketing Act

This bill expands measures to protect the security and integrity of online ticket sales.

Specifically, the bill prohibits the use of applications that perform automated tasks to purchase event tickets from online ticket sellers in circumvention of the seller's posted ticket purchasing order rules. This includes using software applications that circumvent access control systems or security measures.

In addition, online ticket sellers must establish, implement, and maintain reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect the security, confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the seller's website or service.

Further, online ticket sellers must report known incidents of circumvention to the Federal Trade Commission and take reasonable steps to address any such incidents.

The bill establishes civil penalties for violations of the provisions of this bill (and related prohibitions under current law) and authorizes the commission to bring civil actions for such violations.

Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies must coordinate as appropriate with the commission to share information about known instances of cyberattacks against the websites or online services used by ticket sellers.

The commission must report to Congress on the status of enforcement actions taken under this bill.

Discussion

7 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
9
TheLongViewDemoNY-6voted Yea19h ago
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes. Happy to be told I've read it wrong.
9
MidwestMechanicDemoPA-17voted Nay1d ago
Support, without enthusiasm. A narrow fix now beats a comprehensive one that never arrives.
7
grantwoodDemoVA-4voted Yea17h ago
The drafting is loose in places where loose drafting is expensive. Conference could fix it; conference could also make it worse. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
6
cascade_kaiDemoIN-6voted Nay1d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. Worth knowing who asked for this and when.
5
kwame.abadiDemoFL-13voted Yea1d ago
Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. The committee report would settle it either way.
2
TenthAmendmentDemoTX-41d ago
The reporting requirement *is* the guardrail. Once the numbers are public the politics change on their own.
1
BudgetHawk88DemoUT-3voted Nay17h ago
Support, without enthusiasm. A narrow fix now beats a comprehensive one that never arrives. None of that is settled by the summary.
Your position on H.R. 2713No positions yet