S. 3798Senate bill · 119th CongressIn the SenateCrime and Law Enforcement

Safe Access to Cash Act of 2026

Sponsored byTed CruzR-TXIntroduced Feb 5, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Oct 5, 2026) — Held at the desk.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Face Value

as reported to the Senate
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

4 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
9
asha.ferreiraDemoMN-6voted Nay2d ago
This is unglamorous plumbing, and unglamorous plumbing is usually what matters. Yes from me. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
8
imogen.ferreiraDemoMA-7voted Nay2d ago
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes. The committee report would settle it either way.
5
granite_porchDemoKY-2voted Nay2d ago
"The states are doing it" cuts the other way for me. If it works there, why federalise it?
6
granite_porchDemoKY-2voted Nay1d ago
The cost estimate assumes full compliance, and full compliance never happens. That gap is where these things go wrong. None of that is settled by the summary.
Your position on S. 3798No positions yet