S. 2Senate bill · 119th CongressSigned into law2 votes from flippingImmigration

Secure America Act

Introduced May 20, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Jun 10, 2026) No: 119-98.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jun 10, 2026

This act provides $70 billion in funding to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) through FY2029 for immigration enforcement, border security, and related activities.

It is known as a reconciliation bill and includes legislation submitted by certain congressional committees pursuant to provisions in the FY2026 congressional budget resolution (S. Con. Res. 33) that directed the committees to submit legislation to the House or Senate Budget Committee that will increase the deficit. (Reconciliation bills are considered by Congress using expedited legislative procedures that prevent a filibuster and restrict amendments in the Senate.)

TITLE I--COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

(Sec. 101) This section provides funding for CBP to hire, pay, train, and equip Border Patrol agents and Border Patrol support personnel to conduct functions other than immigration enforcement and customs functions.

The funds provided by this section may not be used to recruit, hire, or train personnel for the duties of processing coordinators after October 31, 2028.

(Sec. 102) This section provides funding to ICE for (1) hiring, paying, training, and equipping Homeland Security Investigations (HIS) agents and support personnel; and (2) other necessary expenses for HSI’s mission support and operations and maintenance.

It also requires specified funds to be used to hire, pay, and equip additional child exploitation investigators and forensics analysts for certain HSI offices to (1) support the identification and rescue of victims of child sexual exploitation and abuse, and (2) train such personnel and state and local law enforcement regarding identifying victims of child sexual exploitation and abuse.

The funds provided by this section must be used for functions other than those related to HSI’s immigration enforcement and customs enforcement missions.

(Sec. 103) This section provides funding to CBP for border security, technology, and screening, including

procurement and integration of new nonintrusive inspection equipment and associated civil works (e.g., artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other innovative technologies) and other mission support to combat the entry or exit of illicit narcotics at ports of entry and along the southwest, northern, and maritime borders;upgrading and procurement of platforms for rapid air and marine response capabilities;upgrading and procurement of border surveillance technologies along the southwest, northern, and maritime borders;necessary expenses, including the deployment of technology, relating to the biometric entry and exit system under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004;enhancing border security by combating drug trafficking, including fentanyl and its precursor chemicals, at the southwest, northern, and maritime borders; andnecessary expenses for CBP's mission support and operations and maintenance for functions other than those related to its immigration enforcement and customs missions.None of the funds provided by this section may be used for the procurement or deployment of surveillance towers along the southwest border and the northern border that have not been tested and accepted by CBP to deliver autonomous capabilities.

Under this section the term autonomous means a system designed to apply artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, or other algorithms to accurately detect, identify, classify, and track items of interest in real time such that the system can make operational adjustments without the active engagement of personnel or continuous human command or control.

(Sec. 104) This section provides additional funding to DHS for the purposes for which funding is provided in this title.

TITLE II--COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

(Sec. 201) This section provides funding to CBP for hiring, paying, training, and equipping CBP agents and the necessary support staff, and other necessary expenses for mission support and operations and maintenance, in order to carry out immigration enforcement activities.

(Sec. 202) This section provides funding to ICE for immigration enforcement and related activities, including

hiring, paying, and training personnel;transportation;information technology;facility and fleet maintenance and sustainment;287(g) agreements (i.e., agreements that allow state and local law enforcement agencies to perform certain immigration enforcement functions);the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor;operation and maintenance; andoperations by ICE to arrest certain unlawful aliens.(Sec. 203) This section provides additional funding to DHS for (1) the purposes for which funding is provided in this title, (2) the assignment of certain DHS employees and state officers to carry out immigration enforcement activities, or (3) the participation of state and local agencies in certain homeland security efforts.

Face Value

as enrolled
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

8 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Jun 9, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    214212

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • of the Billdecisive vote

    Senate · Jun 5, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the Senate. This is the vote most people mean.

    5247

    Bill Passed

    Every vote →
  • On Motion to Commit

    House · Jun 9, 2026

    211215

    Failed

    Every vote →
  • On the Motion

    Senate · Jun 5, 2026

    4851

    Motion Rejected

    Every vote →
  • On the Motion

    Senate · Jun 4, 2026

    4652

    Motion Rejected

    Every vote →
  • On the Motion

    Senate · Jun 4, 2026

    4750

    Motion Rejected

    Every vote →
  • On the Motion

    Senate · Jun 4, 2026

    4950

    Motion Rejected

    Every vote →
  • On the

    Senate · Jun 3, 2026

    Whether to start debating it at all. Not a vote on the bill itself.

    5346

    Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    Every vote →

Who lobbied on this

10 organizations

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

  • …Collective Investment Trust or Separate Accounts Insurance Products to establish investment parity with other defined contribution plans, like 401(k)s. 2.H.R.2023, S.988 Womens Retirement Protection Act (WRPA): This legislation imposes spousal consent requirements on nearly all distributions from… filing ↗
  • Amgen Inc.no position stated
    …Favored Patient Act of 2026 PL 119-75 Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 HR 8143/S 4323 Ensuring Access to Lower-Cost Medicines for Seniors Act S.2, Secure America Act filing ↗
  • Anduril Industries, Inc.no position stated
    …FY 2027 Appropriations (H.R. 9310, Homeland Security) and S.2 (Secure America Act) filing ↗
  • Delta Airlinesno position stated
    …S.2 - Secure America… filing ↗
  • Duke Energy Corporationno position stated
    …H.R. 8845 & Senate bill - House and Senate, Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies bills for FY27 (specifically for energy trade issues). S. 2 - Secure America Act No specific legislation: The Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2027 (Reconciliation 3.0) Hydro programs… filing ↗
  • Secure America Act (S. 2 / no House bill number): issues related to U.S. Customs and Border Protection border security technology… filing ↗
  • …Fiscal Year 2026 H.R. 8800: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 S. 4784: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 S. 2: Secure America Act (Public Law 119-18) H.R. 7148: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (Public Law 119-75) Presidents Budget Fiscal Year 2027… filing ↗
  • National Security, Department of State and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027 (H.R. 8595) Secure America Act (S. 2) A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the… filing ↗
  • …S.3466 - Honor Our Promise to Veterans Act of 2025. H.R.9237 - Take Care of Americas Veterans Act. S.2 - Secure America Act. filing ↗
  • The Geo Group, Inc.no position stated
    Homeland Security Appropriations: H.R. 9310, S.2. Issues related to: ICE, immigration enforcement, and alternatives to… filing ↗

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

12 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
23
civicsnerdDemoGA-10voted Yea20d ago
Reading the summary, this looks like it mostly codifies what agencies are already doing informally. That's worth doing — informal practice evaporates when administrations change.
7
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Nay22d ago
Same conclusion, different reasoning. I'm less worried about scope and more about who administers it.
23
r_castellanoDemoMN-6voted Nay23d ago
The intent is fine. The drafting is not. There's no sunset, no review, and no mechanism to stop it if it turns out to be counterproductive.
13
civicsnerdDemoGA-10voted Yea22d ago
Support. The reporting requirements alone would be worth it. You can't fix what nobody is required to measure.
9
kbmontroseDemoNM-2voted Yea20d ago
The plain-English summary is clearer than most, and the core mechanism seems sound. My question is enforcement — who actually checks that this happens?
8
JMTanakaDemoTX-1voted Yea21d ago
Does anyone have the CBO score on this? The summary is silent on cost and that's usually the whole argument.
3
RedRiverRonDemoNJ-1voted Yea23d ago
I'd add that the states already doing this haven't seen the effects the opponents predicted. That's some evidence.
9
SierraTrailDemoCA-12voted Nay21d ago
Honest question, not a gotcha: what would change your mind on this?
-1
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Nay19d ago
Agreed on the substance, disagree on the timing. Doing this badly now makes doing it well later harder.
10
wxriveraDemoMN-4voted Yea18d ago
The sunset clause point is the strongest argument in this thread and nobody has answered it.
8
kbmontroseDemoNM-2voted Yea17d ago
Sure, but 'the states are doing it' cuts the other way for me. If it's working there, why federalise it?
4
TheLongViewDemoNY-6voted Nay19d ago
Counterpoint: the reporting requirement is the guardrail. Once the numbers are public the politics change on their own.
Your position on S. 259% Yea · 22 VoteWire users