kbmontroseDemo

Joined Aug 7, 2026NM-2

Sample account seeded for the VoteWire demo.

positions taken

yea

nay

comments

Agreement with their delegation

on bills that reached the floor

VasquezD-NM-2
50%of 20
33% on the 12 votes that divided the parties
HeinrichD-NM
67%of 6
60% on the 5 votes that divided the parties
LujánD-NM
67%of 6
60% on the 5 votes that divided the parties

The big number counts every bill where you both took a position. The smaller one counts only the votes where the two parties went opposite ways — which is the number that says something, because agreeing on a bill nobody opposed isn't agreement.

Positions

41 total

Recent comments

H.R. 10104 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the penalties for sale for use and use of dyed fuel in taxable use.
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
8 points · 2d ago
H.R. 10084 — First Time Homebuyer Debt Reduction Act
Voting no on process rather than substance. This hasn't had a hearing I can find, which is a lot of reach for a bill nobody has questioned in public. I'd rather see it fixed in committee than argued about on the floor.
7 points · 2d ago
H.R. 10088 — To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, to conduct a study to assess the potential for expanding the safe and effective use of reprocessed single-use devices, and for other purposes.
The pilot-programme framing is the part I'd watch. Pilots have a way of becoming permanent at the next reauthorisation. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
3 points · 3d ago
H.R. 10084 — First Time Homebuyer Debt Reduction Act
Where are you reading that? I've been through the summary twice and can't find it.
5 points · 5d ago
H.R. 10084 — First Time Homebuyer Debt Reduction Act
The cost estimate assumes full compliance, and full compliance never happens. That gap is where these things go wrong. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
6 points · 5d ago
H.R. 10104 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the penalties for sale for use and use of dyed fuel in taxable use.
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes.
6 points · 6d ago
H.R. 10104 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the penalties for sale for use and use of dyed fuel in taxable use.
Agreed on substance, disagreed on timing. Doing this badly now makes doing it well later harder.
2 points · 6d ago
S. 2 — Secure America Act
Sure, but 'the states are doing it' cuts the other way for me. If it's working there, why federalise it?
8 points · 17d ago
H.R. 2913 — Ukraine Support Act
My objection is scope creep. The title describes something narrow; the text is considerably broader than the title suggests.
12 points · 19d ago
S. 2 — Secure America Act
The plain-English summary is clearer than most, and the core mechanism seems sound. My question is enforcement — who actually checks that this happens?
9 points · 20d ago