H.R. 10578House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

To authorize certain labor market data collection activities and to improve Federal measurement of the workforce impacts of artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.

Sponsored byDave MinD-CA-47Introduced Sep 24, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 24, 2026) — on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Discussion

6 comments

Sort

greta.vasquezDemoFL-3voted Yea11d ago

What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.

harborlightDemoCA-40voted Nay11d ago

The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.

AnnaLeeCDemoCA-38voted Yea10d ago

Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. Someone closer to this than me should say whether that's right.

j_okonkwoDemoNC-14voted Yea12d ago

No from me. Pushing the cost to states without saying so is still an unfunded mandate. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.

kwame_commuterDemoMD-7voted Nay12d ago

Genuine question rather than a gotcha: what does success look like in five years? If we can't say, what are we actually voting on? The committee report would settle it either way.

harbor_districtDemoOH-4voted Yea11d ago

The drafting is loose in places where loose drafting is expensive. Conference could fix it; conference could also make it worse. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.

Your position on H.R. 10578No positions yet