A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision".
Latest action (Dec 5, 2025) — No: 119-47.
What it does
Congressional Research Service, Dec 5, 2025This joint resolution reopens portions of the National Petroleum Reserve for oil and gas leasing. (The reserve is an approximately 23-million-acre area on Alaska’s North Slope.)
Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies a plan submitted by the Bureau of Land Management in a rule titled National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision and issued on April 25, 2022. The 2022 plan replaced the 2020 plan and closed approximately 48% of the reserve to oil and gas leasing in order to protect certain surface resources and uses, such as protecting wildlife and providing subsistence for communities. Thus, the joint resolution removes the protections provided under the 2022 plan and reverts to the 2020 plan.
Face Value
as enrolledHow much of this bill its name accounts for.
- Every bill starts at100
- Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.
Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out
What Congress did
3 recordeddecisive vote
House · Nov 18, 2025
Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.
On the decisive vote
Senate · Oct 30, 2025
On the
Senate · Oct 29, 2025
Whether to start debating it at all. Not a vote on the bill itself.
Who lobbied on this
1 organizationThese organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.
- Human Rights Campaignno position stated
“…Act, 2026 H.R. 5214: District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act of 2025 H.Res. 879: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 80) H.R. 5474: No DEI in DC Act S. Res. 503: A resolution recognizing the third commemoration of the anti-LGBTQ+ attack that occurred on…” filing ↗
Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.
Discussion
0 commentsSign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.
No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.