S. 3315Senate bill · 119th CongressIn the SenateHealth

Health Care Cybersecurity and Resiliency Act of 2026

Sponsored byBill CassidyR-LAIntroduced Dec 2, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Oct 5, 2026) — Held at the desk.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Mar 23, 2026

This bill expands federal requirements and resources for preventing and responding to cybersecurity incidents in the health care and public health sectors.

The bill directs the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to

require private health care-related entities to adopt minimum cybersecurity practices (e.g., multifactor authentication),more specifically identify the standards for mitigating penalties relating to violations of health information privacy and security,expand and update biennially a specified plan that details cybersecurity protocols for HHS personnel,provide training and best practices to support the expansion of the workforce for health care cybersecurity, provide guidance on cybersecurity readiness to rural entities, anddesignate one representative to lead oversight and coordination of cybersecurity activities within HHS.Also, HHS and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) must coordinate to improve health care cybersecurity, including by (1) providing resources for entities receiving information from HHS or CISA programs, and (2) establishing a joint cybersecurity capability plan to coordinate responses to significant incidents.

Additionally, the bill requires health care providers and plans to include the number of individuals affected when notifying individuals of unauthorized access to health information (i.e., a breach).

Face Value

as reported to the Senate
99Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Length−1

    26 sections, against 20 before length counts against a bill.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

4 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
8
NorthWoodsNinaDemoNY-12voted Nay2d ago
The drafting is loose in places where loose drafting is expensive. Conference could fix it; conference could also make it worse. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
8
TenthAmendmentDemoTX-4voted Nay2d ago
I'd support this and still say the effective date is optimistic. Everything downstream of it assumes agencies move faster than they do. I'd want the cost estimate before I'd defend either position.
7
steelcityscribeDemoMI-7voted Yea2d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. I'd want the cost estimate before I'd defend either position.
2
NorthWoodsNinaDemoNY-12voted Nay2d ago
Where are you reading that? I've been through the summary twice and can't find it.
Your position on S. 3315No positions yet