Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act of 2025
Latest action (Oct 23, 2025) — Read twice and on Environment and Public Works.
What it does
not written yetThe Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.
In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗
We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.
Face Value
as introducedHow much of this bill its name accounts for.
- Every bill starts at100
- Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.
Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out
Who lobbied on this
2 organizationsThese organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.
- Edison Internationalno position stated
“Tax Issues Nuclear Issues Clean Energy Wildfires S. 3044 Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act of 2025 Transmission Hydropower Liscensing H.R. 4754 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related…” filing ↗
- National Association of Mutual Insurance Companiesno position stated
“…to provide assistance for common interest communities, condominiums, and housing cooperatives damaged by a major disaster, and for other purposes. S.3044 - Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act of 2025 S.3149 - A bill to provide for cost-share waivers for projects carried out in response to wildland…” filing ↗
Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.
Discussion
0 commentsSign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.
No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.