S. 2015Senate bill · 119th CongressOn the calendarPublic Lands and Natural Resources

National Prescribed Fire Act of 2025

Sponsored byRon WydenD-ORIntroduced Jun 10, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 17, 2026) — under General Orders. Calendar No. 635.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jun 10, 2025

This bill directs the Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of the Interior to increase the number and size of prescribed fires conducted on federal lands.

For 10 years, Interior and USDA must annually conduct prescribed fires on federal land so that the total acreage where prescribed fires are conducted is 10% greater than the previous fiscal year.

Interior and USDA must establish a collaborative prescribed fire program to provide financial assistance to eligible entities to conduct prescribed fires in priority landscapes.

Interior and USDA may enter into cooperative agreements or contracts with states, Indian tribes, counties, municipal governments, fire districts, nongovernmental organizations, or private entities to coordinate prescribed fires on federal land.

Interior and USDA must expand employment opportunities for prescribed fire practitioners, including by expanding hazard pay, supporting underrepresented groups, and establishing additional training centers.

To address the public health and safety risk of the expanded use of prescribed fire, the Environmental Protection Agency must coordinate with state, tribal, and local air quality agencies to support the environmental review of wildland fires.

Face Value

as reported to the Senate
83Focused

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Areas of law−16

    Amends 3 separate titles of the US Code: 5, 28, 54.

  • Length−1

    26 sections, against 20 before length counts against a bill.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

2 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
7
district_watcherDemoTX-27voted Nay16d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. Whether that matters depends entirely on the implementation date.
6
cecilia_ruizDemoMI-3voted Yea16d ago
The drafting is loose in places where loose drafting is expensive. Conference could fix it; conference could also make it worse. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
Your position on S. 2015No positions yet