H.R. 9770House bill · 119th CongressIn the SenateEconomics and Public Finance

Continuing Appropriations Act, 2027

Sponsored byTom ColeR-OK-4Introduced Jul 18, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Jul 22, 2026) Received in the Senate.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jul 21, 2026

This bill provides continuing FY2027 appropriations for federal agencies and extends various expiring programs and authorities.

Specifically, the bill provides continuing FY2027 appropriations to federal agencies through the earlier of December 4, 2026, or the enactment of the applicable appropriations act. It is known as a continuing resolution (CR) and prevents a government shutdown that would otherwise occur if the FY2027 appropriations bills have not been enacted when FY2027 begins on October 1, 2026.

The CR funds most programs and activities at the FY2026 levels with several exceptions that provide funding flexibility or additional appropriations for various programs. For example, the bill includes exceptions for

the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC);Small Business Administration loan programs;the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Disaster Relief Fund;the Indian Health Service; andwildfire suppression activities.In addition, the bill extends several expiring programs, authorities, and restrictions, including

the Department of Agriculture’s livestock mandatory price reporting program,the National Flood Insurance Program,limits on pay increases for the Vice President and certain senior political appointees,the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program,the authority to waive certain pay limitations that apply to wildland firefighters and other wildland fire personnel, the authority for the District of Columbia to spend local funds, andthe freeze on cost-of-living adjustments for Members of Congress. The bill also provides the customary payments to the beneficiaries of the late Representative David Scott and the late Senator Lindsey Graham.

Face Value

as passed the House
99Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Length−1

    29 sections, against 20 before length counts against a bill.

  • Name admits it

    The short title says the bill is broad, so both penalties are halved.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

1 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Jul 21, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    220205

    Passed

    Every vote →

Discussion

7 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
24
RedRiverRonDemoNJ-1voted Nay19d ago
Opposed, mainly on process — this hasn't had a hearing that I can find, and it's moving fast for something with this much reach.
4
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Yea18d ago
That's the part I can't get past either. The authority is broad and the guardrails are thin.
11
gulfcoastgailDemoNJ-8voted Nay20d ago
Does anyone have the CBO score on this? The summary is silent on cost and that's usually the whole argument.
4
tomas.delgadoDemoVA-4voted Nay22d ago
Agreed on the substance, disagree on the timing. Doing this badly now makes doing it well later harder.
1
dustin_reyesDemoNJ-11voted Yea28d ago
In favour, with a caveat: the effective date is doing a lot of work here. If it slips, everything else in this bill is theoretical.
3
avery.nbDemoWA-3voted Yea21d ago
Sure, but 'the states are doing it' cuts the other way for me. If it's working there, why federalise it?
1
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Yea17d ago
Same conclusion, different reasoning. I'm less worried about scope and more about who administers it.
Your position on H.R. 977059% Yea · 17 VoteWire users