H.R. 9496House bill · 119th CongressIn the SenateTaxation

End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act

Sponsored byClaudia TenneyR-NY-24Introduced Jun 29, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 16, 2026) — Received in the Senate and Read twice and on Finance.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Sep 8, 2026

This bill extends certain federal tax deadlines for U.S. nationals who are unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad or held hostage abroad and their spouses. The bill also allows for an abatement and refund of additional taxes, interest, and penalties assessed to such individuals for failing to meet a federal tax deadline during a period of detention.

Specifically, under the bill, the time period during which a U.S. national is unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad or held hostage abroad is disregarded in determining certain federal tax deadlines, including deadlines for

filing a return for and paying federal income, estate, gift, employment, or excise taxes;a tax credit or refund claim; andthe determination, assessment, and collection of additional taxes, interest, or penalties.The bill requires the Department of State and the Department of Justice to annually provide the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with lists to identify U.S. nationals who qualify for an extension.

The bill also requires the IRS to (1) abate and refund additional taxes, interest, and penalties assessed for any tax year ending during a period of detention for which an extension of a federal tax deadline is permitted; and (2) establish a program allowing U.S. nationals unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad or taken hostage abroad (or their spouse or dependent) to claim a refund of additional taxes, interest, and penalties assessed for any tax year ending during a period of detention from 2021 to the bill’s enactment date.

Face Value

as reported to the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

5 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
8
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Nay28d ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
4
pine_ledgerDemoCT-3voted Yea28d ago
Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. Someone closer to this than me should say whether that's right.
2
PragmaticPeteDemoAL-3voted Nay28d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. Happy to be told I've read it wrong.
2
OldLineStateDemoOH-1voted Yea28d ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. I'd rather see it fixed in committee than argued about on the floor.
3
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Nay28d ago
That's true of almost every bill though, isn't it? At some point the objection stops being about this one.
Your position on H.R. 9496No positions yet