H.R. 9332House bill · 119th CongressIn progressEnergy

Load Forecasting Enhancement Act

Sponsored byTroy BaldersonR-OH-12Introduced Jun 18, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 15, 2026) — Motion to reconsider Agreed to without objection.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jun 18, 2026

This bill requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to establish regional boards to study and recommend best practices for electric load forecasting, which is the process of predicting the demand for electricity at a particular time. It also requires states to consider adopting the recommendations.

Specifically, the bill directs FERC to establish regional boards to study electric load forecasting, chair the boards, and run them jointly with each state public utility commission in the regions. The boards must (1) study issues relevant to identifying best practices for electric load forecasting that enhance the reliability and affordability of electric service to customers, and (2) identify such best practices. FERC must make recommendations to Congress for the consistent use across states of such best practices by electric utilities.

The bill also modifies provisions under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act to require state public utility commissions to consider adopting those recommendations.

It also modifies the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to make federal assistance for state energy conservation plans contingent upon the plan including procedures and programs to improve the accuracy, oversight, and transparency to stakeholders of the forecasting of electric loads by electric utilities.

Face Value

as reported to the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Who lobbied on this

4 organizations

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

  • “…Discussed H.R. 9332, the Load Forecasting Enhancement Act, to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to establish regional joint boards to study…” filing ↗
  • Duke Energy Corporationno position stated
    “…Power Act S.3585 DATA Act of 2026 H.R. 8033, No Harm Data Centers Act H.R. 7257, SECURE Grid Act S. 3814 - Accelerating Reliable Capacity ARC Act H.R.9332, Load Forecasting Enhancement Act H.R.9339, Affordable Innovation for the Grid Act H.R.9335 Advanced Transmission Technology to Reduce Rates…” filing ↗
  • Edison Electric Instituteno position stated
    “…H.R. 9332, Load Forecasting Enhancement…” filing ↗
  • Xcel Energyno position stated
    “…H.R. 9332, Load Forecasting Enhancement…” filing ↗

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

3 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
9
j_okonkwoDemoNC-14voted Yea22d ago
I'd support this and still say the effective date is optimistic. Everything downstream of it assumes agencies move faster than they do.
2
marisol_qDemoPA-1422d ago
Honest question, not a trap: what would change your mind?
9
rustbelt_rayDemoLA-2voted Yea22d ago
No from me. Pushing the cost to states without saying so is still an unfunded mandate. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
Your position on H.R. 9332No positions yet