H.R. 556House bill · 119th CongressIn the SenatePublic Lands and Natural Resources

Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act

Sponsored byRobert J. WittmanR-VA-1Introduced Jan 16, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Mar 19, 2026) Received in the Senate and Read twice and on Environment and Public Works.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jan 16, 2025

Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025

This bill bars the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the Forest Service from prohibiting or regulating the use of lead ammunition or tackle on federal land or water. The bill makes exceptions for specified existing regulations and where the FWS, the BLM, or the Forest Service determines that a decline in wildlife population at the specific unit of federal land or water is primarily caused by the use of lead in ammunition or tackle, based on the field data from such unit, and the state approves the regulations.

Face Value

as passed the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

2 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Mar 18, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    215202

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • On

    House · Mar 18, 2026

    The minority party's last attempt to change the bill by sending it back to committee. It usually fails and is usually about forcing an awkward vote.

    206209

    Failed

    Every vote →

Who lobbied on this

1 organization

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort

No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.

Your position on H.R. 556No positions yet