H.R. 4307House bill · 119th CongressSigned into lawCrime and Law Enforcement

Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act

Sponsored byTim WalbergR-MI-5Introduced Jul 10, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Oct 20, 2026) — No: 119-131.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Feb 20, 2026

This bill requires the Department of Labor to provide training and education to its employees on how to effectively assist law enforcement in detecting human trafficking.

The bill directs Labor to determine which employees should receive the training and education based on their official duties. Further, it requires the training and education to include information that is appropriate for the employees' location or environment; that reflects current trends and best practices for the location or environment; and that is relevant to detecting human trafficking, identifying suspected victims, and referring potential cases to the Department of Justice and other appropriate authorities.

Face Value

as enrolled
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Who lobbied on this

1 organization

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

  • “…on Supply Chain Resiliency ---Issues Relating to Non-Human Primate Shortages Intellectual Property International Enforcement ---China S.2115/H.R.4307 - Medical Supply Chain Resiliency Act Synthetic Biotech Pharmaceutical and Ag Biotech Tariffs US-China Trade Agreement ---Ag-Biotech…” filing ↗

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

4 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
9
pine_ledgerDemoCT-3voted Nay1d ago
Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
6
cedarprecinctDemoTX-33voted Yea1d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. I'd want the cost estimate before I'd defend either position.
4
civicsnerdDemoGA-10voted Nay1d ago
That's the part I can't get past either — broad authority, thin guardrails.
3
civicsnerdDemoGA-10voted Nay1d ago
Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. None of that is settled by the summary.
Your position on H.R. 4307No positions yet