H.R. 4090House bill · 119th CongressIn progressEnergy

Critical Mineral Dominance Act

Sponsored byPete StauberR-MN-8Introduced Jun 23, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Jul 15, 2026) Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Nov 25, 2025

This bill directs the Department of the Interior to address mineral supply chain vulnerabilities, including by accelerating and expanding mineral production on federal land (i.e., National Forest System land, public lands, and any land that may be leased for the exploration, development, or production of hardrock minerals).

Interior must (1) identify priority mining projects on federal lands that can be immediately approved, and (2) take all necessary and appropriate steps to expedite those projects.

Interior must also identify active, inactive, or proposed mining projects on federal land that have the potential to (1) increase production of hardrock minerals or their byproducts, (2) expand existing operations to include such byproducts, or (3) produce hardrock minerals from mine tailings or coal byproducts.

Further, Interior must identify certain federal land with potential for hardrock mining. Interior must prioritize identifying land where a mining project (1) can most quickly be fully permitted and operational, and (2) would have the greatest potential effect on the robustness of the domestic mineral supply chain.

Interior must (1) suspend, revise, or rescind agency actions that place undue burdens on mining projects; (2) recommend changes to current law necessary to expand U.S. production of hardrock minerals; and (3) review state and local laws that impede development of domestic mining and mineral exploration projects.

Interior must also report on the dollar value and overall economic impact of the United States' reliance on imports of certain mineral commodities.

Finally, Interior must prioritize efforts to accelerate geologic mapping.

Face Value

as passed the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

2 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Feb 4, 2026

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    224195

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • On

    House · Feb 4, 2026

    The minority party's last attempt to change the bill by sending it back to committee. It usually fails and is usually about forcing an awkward vote.

    209212

    Failed

    Every vote →

Discussion

5 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
24
avery.nbDemoWA-3voted Yea29d ago
The plain-English summary is clearer than most, and the core mechanism seems sound. My question is enforcement — who actually checks that this happens?
8
AnnaLeeCDemoCA-38voted Yea23d ago
Reading the summary, this looks like it mostly codifies what agencies are already doing informally. That's worth doing — informal practice evaporates when administrations change.
5
SierraTrailDemoCA-12voted Yea21d ago
Where are you seeing that? I read the summary twice and it doesn't say that anywhere.
1
dustin_reyesDemoNJ-11voted Yea23d ago
This is the kind of unglamorous plumbing that never makes the news and matters more than the stuff that does.
6
avery.nbDemoWA-3voted Yea20d ago
Same conclusion, different reasoning. I'm less worried about scope and more about who administers it.
Your position on H.R. 409079% Yea · 19 VoteWire users