H.R. 3937House bill · 119th CongressOn the calendarPublic Lands and Natural Resources

Wabeno Economic Development Act

Sponsored byThomas P. TiffanyR-WI-7Introduced Jun 11, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Jul 23, 2026) under General Orders. Calendar No. 494.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jun 11, 2025

This bill requires the Forest Service to convey approximately 14 acres of federal land, including the mineral rights, in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Wisconsin, to Tony's Wabeno Redi-Mix, LLC, upon receiving an offer to buy the land for market value.

The Forest Service must complete an appraisal to determine the market value of the land, and the offer must be received within 180 days after federal approval of such appraisal. Tony's Wabeno Redi-Mix, LLC, must pay an amount equal to the market value of the land and all associated costs as a condition of conveyance.

Additionally, the Department of the Interior must publish a comprehensive review of the federal permitting processes for the development of stone, sand, and gravel on federal lands.

Face Value

as passed the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

1 recorded
  • On , as Amendeddecisive vote

    House · Jul 22, 2025

    A fast-track vote: no amendments, short debate, and two thirds needed to pass. Used for bills expected to be uncontroversial.

    4101

    Passed

    Every vote →

Who lobbied on this

3 organizations

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort

No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.

Your position on H.R. 393783% Yea · 6 VoteWire users