H.R. 1118House bill · 119th CongressIn the SenateGovernment Operations and Politics

Value Over Cost Act of 2026

Sponsored byByron DonaldsR-FL-19Introduced Feb 7, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Jul 22, 2026) Received in the Senate and Read twice and on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Feb 7, 2025

Value Over Cost Act of 2025

This bill specifies that contracts and orders under the multiple award schedule program of the General Services Administration (GSA) may be evaluated on best value, rather than lowest overall cost, if the GSA determines that to be in the best interests of the federal government. (Best value allows consideration of non-cost factors when evaluating contract proposals to determine the offer that provides the greatest overall benefit. The GSA's multiple award schedules provide federal agencies with a simplified process for obtaining commercial supplies and commercial services at prices associated with volume buying.)

Face Value

as passed the House
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

1 recorded
  • On , as Amendeddecisive vote

    House · Jul 21, 2026

    A fast-track vote: no amendments, short debate, and two thirds needed to pass. Used for bills expected to be uncontroversial.

    4211

    Passed

    Every vote →

Discussion

6 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
23
mfitzhughDemoGA-9voted Yea18d ago
In favour, with a caveat: the effective date is doing a lot of work here. If it slips, everything else in this bill is theoretical.
10
m.kowalczykDemoLA-1voted Yea23d ago
Agreed on the substance, disagree on the timing. Doing this badly now makes doing it well later harder.
2
SierraTrailDemoCA-12voted Yea20d ago
That's the part I can't get past either. The authority is broad and the guardrails are thin.
-1
MidwestMechanicDemoPA-17voted Nay18d ago
Where are you seeing that? I read the summary twice and it doesn't say that anywhere.
13
PlainsVoterDemoIL-7voted Yea19d ago
Has this been introduced in a previous Congress? Feels familiar, and if it died before, I'd like to know why.
9
mfitzhughDemoGA-9voted Yea23d ago
I'd vote yes, but not enthusiastically. It solves a narrow version of a broad problem, and I'd rather have the narrow fix now than nothing for another two years.
Your position on H.R. 111883% Yea · 12 VoteWire users