H.R. 10889House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish the retail motor fuel credit.

Sponsored byBrian J. MastR-FL-21Introduced Oct 22, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Oct 22, 2026) — on Ways and Means.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Discussion

5 comments

Sort

yara.novakDemoVT-ALvoted Nay19h ago

Voting no on process rather than substance. This hasn't had a hearing I can find, which is a lot of reach for a bill nobody has questioned in public. Someone closer to this than me should say whether that's right.

cedarprecinctDemoTX-33voted Nay11h ago

The sunset point is the strongest thing in this thread and nobody's answered it.

cedarprecinctDemoTX-33voted Nay1d ago

I'd support this and still say the effective date is optimistic. Everything downstream of it assumes agencies move faster than they do. The committee report would settle it either way.

dustin_reyesDemoNJ-11voted Yea22h ago

Genuine question rather than a gotcha: what does success look like in five years? If we can't say, what are we actually voting on? None of that is settled by the summary.

river_surveyorDemoTX-16voted Nay18h ago

Against, and not because the goal is wrong. It stacks a new process on top of two that already don't talk to each other. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.

Your position on H.R. 10889No positions yet