H.R. 10848House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to review of Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program, and for other purposes.

Sponsored byMaggie GoodlanderD-NH-2Introduced Oct 19, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Oct 19, 2026) — on Armed Services.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Discussion

6 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
8
avery.nbDemoWA-3voted Yea2d ago
Genuine question rather than a gotcha: what does success look like in five years? If we can't say, what are we actually voting on? The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
8
esme_watcherDemoCA-28voted Yea2d ago
Against, and not because the goal is wrong. It stacks a new process on top of two that already don't talk to each other. The floor version may not be this version, which is the usual problem.
4
wxriveraDemoMN-4voted Nay2d ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
3
quiet_walkerDemoTX-35voted Nay3d ago
My hesitation is the absence of a sunset. Authorities that never expire never get re-examined either. Whether that matters depends entirely on the implementation date.
2
notmyfirstrodeoDemoCO-1voted Nay3d ago
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
3
quiet_walkerDemoTX-35voted Nay3d ago
The states already trying this haven't seen the effects opponents predicted. That's evidence, for what it's worth.
Your position on H.R. 10848No positions yet