H.R. 10846House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax on certain indebtedness, and for other purposes.

Sponsored byLaura FriedmanD-CA-30Introduced Oct 19, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Oct 19, 2026) — on Ways and Means.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Discussion

6 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
8
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Nay3d ago
I keep going back and forth on this one. The problem is real; I'm not convinced this is the instrument for it. The committee report would settle it either way.
5
river_precinctDemoSC-2voted Nay2d ago
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
4
granite_porchDemoKY-2voted Yea2d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. The committee report would settle it either way.
5
r_castellanoDemoMN-62d ago
Same conclusion, different route. I'm less worried about the reach and more about who ends up administering it.
2
grantwoodDemoVA-4voted Nay3d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
2
frontledgerDemoOH-153d ago
You're right about the drafting, but that's fixable in conference. Killing it means starting over next Congress.
Your position on H.R. 10846No positions yet