H.R. 10552House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

To establish the Karly Rain Wood Repeat Violent Felon Registration and Notification Program within the Department of Justice, and for other purposes.

Sponsored byMike FloodR-NE-1Introduced Sep 24, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 24, 2026) — on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Natural Resources, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Discussion

4 comments

Sort

birch_districtDemoSC-5voted Nay13d ago

The cost estimate assumes full compliance, and full compliance never happens. That gap is where these things go wrong. Whether that matters depends entirely on the implementation date.

marisol_qDemoPA-14voted Yea13d ago

My hesitation is the absence of a sunset. Authorities that never expire never get re-examined either. None of that is settled by the summary.

PurpleDistrictDemoSC-2voted Nay13d ago

In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. None of that is settled by the summary.

river_readerDemoIL-10voted Yea13d ago

Genuine question rather than a gotcha: what does success look like in five years? If we can't say, what are we actually voting on? I'd rather see it fixed in committee than argued about on the floor.

Your position on H.R. 10552No positions yet