H.R. 1048House bill · 119th CongressIn the SenateEducation

Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions Act

DETERRENT Act

Sponsored byMichael BaumgartnerR-WA-5Introduced Feb 6, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Mar 31, 2025) Received in the Senate and Read twice and on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Feb 6, 2025

Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions Act or the DETERRENT Act

This bill expands oversight and disclosure requirements related to foreign sources and institutions of higher education (IHEs).

Specifically, the bill requires an IHE to annually disclose to the Department of Education (ED) any year in which the IHE

receives a gift from a foreign country of concern (e.g., China or Russia) or foreign entity of concern of any dollar amount;receives a gift or contract from a foreign source (other than a foreign country of concern or foreign entity of concern) that is valued at $50,000 or more, considered alone or in combination with all other gifts or contracts within a calendar year (current disclosure threshold is $250,000 or more), or which has an undetermined monetary value;enters into a contract with a foreign country of concern or foreign entity of concern after receiving a waiver for such contract; oris substantially controlled by a foreign source.Additionally, the bill

prohibits IHEs from entering into contracts with a foreign country of concern or with a foreign entity of concern without obtaining a waiver,requires certain IHEs to disclose gifts or contracts between covered individuals (e.g., researchers) and foreign sources, andrequires private IHEs with specified assets or investments to file annual investment disclosure reports.The bill requires ED to investigate possible violations of this bill and outlines the various penalties for each violation. Penalties may include losing eligibility for federal student financial aid.

Face Value

as passed the House
92Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Areas of law−8

    Amends 2 titles of the US Code (5 and 10) rather than one.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

5 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Mar 27, 2025

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    241169

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • On Agreeing to the Amendment

    House · Mar 27, 2025

    Whether to change the bill in the way this amendment proposes.

    199214

    Failed

    Every vote →
  • On Agreeing to the Amendment

    House · Mar 27, 2025

    Whether to change the bill in the way this amendment proposes.

    92321

    Failed

    Every vote →
  • On Agreeing to the Amendment

    House · Mar 27, 2025

    Whether to change the bill in the way this amendment proposes.

    3410

    Failed

    Every vote →
  • On Agreeing to the Amendment

    House · Mar 27, 2025

    Whether to change the bill in the way this amendment proposes.

    4404

    Failed

    Every vote →

Who lobbied on this

2 organizations

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

  • J Streetno position stated
    H.R. 768 - Holocaust Education and Antisemitism Lessons Act S.558 - Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2025 H.R.1007 - Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2025 H.R.1048 - DETERRENT Act H.R.5714 - October 7 Remembrance Education Act S.163 - Protecting Students on Campus Act of 2025 H.R.6186 - No Antisemitism… filing ↗
  • …HEA (Higher Education Act) H.R. 1048 - DETERRENT Act H.R. 3265 - Protecting our Students in Schools Act of 2025 H.R. 3267 - PSLF Payment Completion Fairness Act H.R. 3308 -… filing ↗

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort

No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.

Your position on H.R. 1048No positions yet