H.R. 10344House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

Fast Track Disaster Relief Act

Sponsored byAnalilia MejiaD-NJ-11Introduced Sep 10, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 10, 2026) on Ways and Means.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Face Value

as introduced
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

8 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
9
birch_districtDemoSC-5voted Nay18h ago
Voting no on process rather than substance. This hasn't had a hearing I can find, which is a lot of reach for a bill nobody has questioned in public. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
8
BackbenchBrendaDemoPA-2voted Yea19h ago
I'd like to see the fiscal note before taking a position. The summary is silent on cost, which is normally the whole argument. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
4
NorthWoodsNinaDemoNY-12voted Nay1d ago
Has a version of this been introduced before? It feels familiar, and if it died last Congress I'd want to know what killed it. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
2
nadia.hartleyDemoNV-2voted Yea2d ago
My hesitation is the absence of a sunset. Authorities that never expire never get re-examined either. Whether that matters depends entirely on the implementation date.
2
dustin_reyesDemoNJ-11voted Nay2d ago
I keep going back and forth on this one. The problem is real; I'm not convinced this is the instrument for it. The floor version may not be this version, which is the usual problem.
2
r_castellanoDemoMN-6voted Nay2d ago
The drafting is loose in places where loose drafting is expensive. Conference could fix it; conference could also make it worse.
1
birch_ledgerDemoLA-2voted Yea1d ago
My hesitation is the absence of a sunset. Authorities that never expire never get re-examined either. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
5
TheLongViewDemoNY-61d ago
Fair, though the alternative on the table is nothing, and nothing has a cost too.
Your position on H.R. 10344No positions yet