VoteWire
Sign inStart voting
H.R. 10320House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

Town Halls for All Act of 2026

Sponsored byJoe NeguseD-CO-2Introduced Sep 8, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 8, 2026) — on House Administration.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Face Value

as introduced
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

8 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
7
PragmaticPeteDemoAL-3voted Yea4d ago
No from me. Pushing the cost to states without saying so is still an unfunded mandate. Someone closer to this than me should say whether that's right.
6
marisol_qDemoPA-14voted Nay5d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. The committee report would settle it either way.
4
esme_watcherDemoCA-28voted Nay3d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. None of that is settled by the summary.
4
sylvie_civicDemoFL-11voted Yea3d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. The committee report would settle it either way.
2
TheLongViewDemoNY-63d ago
That's true of almost every bill though, isn't it? At some point the objection stops being about this one.
4
birch_ledgerDemoLA-2voted Nay4d ago
Worth reading the sponsor list before deciding — it's less partisan than the framing suggests. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
3
gulfcoastgailDemoNJ-8voted Nay4d ago
What I'd want before deciding: who administers it, out of which budget, and who they answer to when it doesn't work. The floor version may not be this version, which is the usual problem.
3
river_readerDemoIL-10voted Yea4d ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. The floor version may not be this version, which is the usual problem.
Your position on H.R. 10320No positions yet