H.R. 10287House bill · 119th CongressIn committeeHealth

9-8-8 Crisis Response Act

Sponsored byKim SchrierD-WA-8Introduced Sep 3, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Sep 3, 2026) — on Energy and Commerce.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Face Value

as introduced
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

3 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
5
j_okonkwoDemoNC-14voted Nay1mo ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. Whether that matters depends entirely on the implementation date.
5
gulfcoastgailDemoNJ-8voted Nay1mo ago
My hesitation is the absence of a sunset. Authorities that never expire never get re-examined either. It'll come down to what the agency does with it.
3
PragmaticPeteDemoAL-3voted Nay1mo ago
I'd support this and still say the effective date is optimistic. Everything downstream of it assumes agencies move faster than they do. That's a drafting question rather than a political one.
Your position on H.R. 10287No positions yet