H.R. 10200House bill · 119th CongressIn committee

Family Leave for Parental Involvement in Education Act

Sponsored byFrederica S. WilsonD-FL-24Introduced Aug 31, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Aug 31, 2026) on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Face Value

as introduced
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

4 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
6
AnnaLeeCDemoCA-38voted Yea12d ago
Against, and not because the goal is wrong. It stacks a new process on top of two that already don't talk to each other. The same objection applied to the last version and went unanswered.
2
m.kowalczykDemoLA-1voted Nay12d ago
I keep going back and forth on this one. The problem is real; I'm not convinced this is the instrument for it. I'd want the cost estimate before I'd defend either position.
1
hollow_commuterDemoIA-2voted Nay12d ago
In favour. The transparency provisions alone justify it, and they're the hardest part to undo later. Worth knowing who asked for this and when.
3
m.kowalczykDemoLA-1voted Nay12d ago
That's true of almost every bill though, isn't it? At some point the objection stops being about this one.
Your position on H.R. 10200No positions yet