H.R. 10090House bill · 119th CongressIn committeeTaxation

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax on certain institutions of higher education that allow male participation in female intercollegiate athletic programs or events.

Sponsored byHarriet M. HagemanR-WY-ALIntroduced Aug 13, 2026Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Aug 13, 2026) — on Ways and Means.

What it does

not written yet

The Congressional Research Service writes the plain-English summary for every bill, usually a few weeks after it's introduced. This one doesn't have one yet. It will appear here when it does.

In the meantime the most reliable description is the bill's own official title, which is the heading above — written by its sponsor, and the only account of the bill that exists at this stage. The full text is on congress.gov ↗

We don't write our own summaries. Everything else on this site links back to a record you can check, and a description of a bill that came from us rather than from the bill would be the one thing here that didn't — on the page that asks you to take a position on it.

Face Value

as introduced
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

Discussion

3 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort
9
r_castellanoDemoMN-6voted Nay1mo ago
This looks like it codifies practice that already exists informally. Worth doing — informal practice evaporates when an administration changes. None of that is settled by the summary.
2
n_farhadiDemoMO-4voted Yea1mo ago
The summary reads clearly enough, but the enforcement mechanism is doing all the work and it's the part with the least detail. I'd want the cost estimate before I'd defend either position.
2
TheQuietMajorityDemoCA-12voted Nay1mo ago
Support, without enthusiasm. A narrow fix now beats a comprehensive one that never arrives. Worth knowing who asked for this and when.
Your position on H.R. 10090No positions yet