H.J.Res. 89House joint resolution · 119th CongressSigned into lawdonor lobbied itEnvironmental Protection

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The "Omnibus" Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

Sponsored byJay ObernolteR-CA-23Introduced Apr 2, 2025Full text on congress.gov ↗

Latest action (Jun 12, 2025) No: 119-17.

What it does

Congressional Research Service, Jun 12, 2025

This joint resolution revokes the waiver granted to the California Air Resources Board regarding new emissions standards for new 2024 and subsequent model year on-road heavy-duty vehicles and engines, off-road diesel engines, and off-road diesel-fueled auxiliary power units. (Under the Clean Air Act, California may seek waivers of the preemption prohibiting states from enacting certain emission standards.)

Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency notice titled California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The ‘Omnibus’ Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision.

Face Value

as enrolled
100Narrow

How much of this bill its name accounts for.

  • Every bill starts at100
  • Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.

Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out

What Congress did

3 recorded
  • decisive vote

    House · Apr 30, 2025

    Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.

    225196

    Passed

    Every vote →
  • On the decisive vote

    Senate · May 22, 2025

    4946

    Joint Resolution Passed

    Every vote →
  • On the

    Senate · May 22, 2025

    Whether to start debating it at all. Not a vote on the bill itself.

    5146

    Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    Every vote →

Who lobbied on this

4 organizations

These organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.

  • …Res 87 and H.J. Res. 89 to roll back California emissions standards Hours-of-Service Regulations Highway Trust Fund Taxes/VMT Taxes Broker and Freight Forwarder… filing ↗
  • Hf Sinclair Corporationno position stated
    …Issues related to fuel efficiency standards. Congressional oversight of EPA and Transportation's emissions policies. H.J.Res.89 - Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection… filing ↗
  • …truck mandate (H.J.Res.26) Legislation which would disapprove EPA's waivers to California Air Resource's Board (H.J.Res. 87/ S.J.Res. 46 and H.J.Res. 89/S.J.Res. 47) Proposals regarding tariffs on autos or autos parts filing ↗
  • Phillips 66no position stated
    Issues related to electric vehicles and fuel efficiency standards. H.J.Res.89 - Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection… filing ↗

Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.

Discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.

Sort

No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.

Your position on H.J.Res. 89No positions yet