Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025.
Latest action (Feb 18, 2026) — No: 119-78.
What it does
Congressional Research Service, Feb 18, 2026This joint resolution reinstates provisions of District of Columbia (DC) tax law to conform with federal tax law.
As background, DC generally automatically adopts changes to federal tax law (known as rolling conformity). Therefore, upon enactment of the 2025 reconciliation act (commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), many of its tax provisions became DC law. DC subsequently enacted its own legislation (the DC Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025) that decoupled DC tax law from these federal provisions.
This joint resolution nullifies the DC legislation, thereby generally realigning DC tax law with the tax provisions of the 2025 reconciliation act.
Specifically, the joint resolution reinstates for DC provisions that
• increase the higher basic standard deduction; • increase deductible charitable cash contributions (for taxpayers who take the standard deduction); • establish a $6,000 tax deduction for taxpayers 65 years and older; • allow a tax deduction of qualified tips, qualified overtime pay, and qualified car loan interest; • authorize an elective 100% depreciation allowance for nonresidential real property; and • authorize businesses to deduct 100% of research and experimental costs retroactive to tax year 2022.
The DC legislation also amended several other provisions of DC tax law, including restoring the DC child tax credit. The joint resolution negates these changes.
Face Value
as enrolledHow much of this bill its name accounts for.
- Every bill starts at100
- Nothing counted against it: one area of law, and short enough that length doesn't register.
Face Value measures reach, not honesty. A big bill can be accurately named, and a low score is not an accusation — it means the contents reach further than any short title could describe. Count it yourself ↗ How this is worked out
What Congress did
3 recordeddecisive vote
House · Feb 4, 2026
Whether the bill passes the House. This is the vote most people mean.
On the decisive vote
Senate · Feb 12, 2026
On the
Senate · Feb 11, 2026
Whether to start debating it at all. Not a vote on the bill itself.
Who lobbied on this
3 organizationsThese organizations told Congress, in their own quarterly disclosures, that they were lobbying on this bill.
- National Association of Wholesaler-distributorsno position stated
“…H.J.Res.142, Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision…” filing ↗
- National Education Associationno position stated
“H.J.Res. 142, DC Income & Freedom Tax Conformity & Revision Temporary Amendment Act” filing ↗
- Securities Industry and Financial Markets Associationno position stated
“…H. J. Res 142, Providing for congressional disapproval of the Department of Labor fiduciary…” filing ↗
Most filings say only that an organization lobbied on a bill, not which side it took — where that's the case we say so rather than guessing. Quotes are verbatim from the filing. How this is built.
Discussion
0 commentsSign in to join the discussion and put your vote on the record.
No comments yet. Be the first to make the case.